February 07, 2012, 05:49:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 

Pages: 1st 1 [2]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Should I build a 351W?  (Read 4452 times)
BadAndy
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident
*
Posts: 17127




Ignore
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2005, 02:55:25 PM »

Or just put some low compression pistons in a 302 and plop a kenne bell 2200 on it Grin
Logged
Gravel
I just want one big ol' BAM boobfest
Administrator
Badass Resident
*
Posts: 18150
Vehicle: 2010 Ford Mustang




« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2005, 04:17:31 PM »

Here is a Car Craft 351 build up...

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0311_clash/index4.html
Logged
TireSmoke
...Is now in HD!
Badass Member
*****
Posts: 7672

Do what you love and f*** the rest




Ignore
« Reply #32 on: January 04, 2005, 04:55:41 PM »

thats true too...

Mine peaked out at 4200 I think....starts coming on at 3000.  If you hit peak at 3000 thats hella nut!  Thats more torquey than a stocker!
Logged

« Last Edit: Today at 02:24:53 AM by TireSmoke »
stang-fan69
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 176

If it has tits or wheels, it gives you problems




Ignore
« Reply #33 on: January 05, 2005, 02:49:29 PM »

Thanks so far, guys!

@BadAndy: Well, a blower would be really nice, but my car has a historic registration here in Germany, so unfotunately, the engine bay has to look quite stock.

So the way to go is build a little nasty stealth engine, put on the original 69 valve covers and paint everything blue... so nobody becomes suspicious. Evil

@Gravel: great link! just bookmarked.

I think combining this setup with the additional cubes of a 392 stroker kit should make even more torque at lower rpm, what do you think?
Logged

Regards from Germany
Andy

69 Mustang Grande 351W
93 VW Golf GT (daily)
Ray III
Village Idiot
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 798

NY what. Genuine northern redneck up here.




Ignore
« Reply #34 on: January 14, 2005, 11:35:43 AM »

Low-end torque is measured at 3000 RPM? Please.

Uhh Ray, he said peak torque coming in around 3000.... If it is nearing peak at 3k then it has a pretty strong line below that... Banging head on wall
I was referring to a previous post. One where the following statement was made:
Quote
This power was not gained at the expense of low rpm torque -- not with 377 ft.-lbs. of it available at three grand.
Logged

this post property of RAYMOND
Pages: 1st 1 [2]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC