87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« on: December 14, 2004, 04:38:05 PM » |
|
hey i"ve been looking at harmonic balancers and fluid dampers cuz mine is shot. I want to put a cam and sum heads and maybe an intake if i can get sum good deals. Gareth  lol So fluid dampers are probably the way to go but is it really worth the extra $$ for me. The less i can spend the better, and also how do i find out what weight i will need. Any help would be appreciated Thanks
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 14, 2004, 05:03:10 PM by 87cobra »
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
Freakingstang
is the one with The Magic Ballz
Badass Supporter
Badass Member

Posts: 4264
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2004, 04:46:31 PM » |
|
If you are working on a newer five liter ('80 and up)it is a 50oz balance. The old 289/302's were 28 oz balance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve, one of many... Badass 1986 GT VERT, 1989 Notch, 1966 Coupe 
|
|
|
BSL
Dam right I'm a
Badass Supporter
Badass Member

Posts: 2117
Southern Ontario
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2004, 04:53:14 PM » |
|
LOL I got all out of breath reading that!!! I believe you need the 50oz damper. (actually a 34 or so oz  ) Fluidamper is big bucks--- And some say detrimental to the life of your engine :/ Check out Romac and Pioneer elastomer dampers. I'll ask Dean next time I stop by his shop, to see what kind of deals there are right now. There are Huge threads in the Corral tech boards on this subject....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Gareth 
|
|
|
87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2004, 04:57:19 PM » |
|
sweet thanks gareth thatd help alot. i might as well go a little better than stock if i end up tossing a cam and stuff in there who knows maybe ill never end up selling my stang lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
Dan
Need An Enema?
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident

Posts: 20200
Vehicle: 2004 Ford Focus
Detroit
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2004, 05:01:39 PM » |
|
Romac makes a really good balancer. Fluidamper, IMO, is kind of a waste of your money. Unless you're going to be making like 9 bajillion trillion horsepower, something in the middle of the market will work perfectly fine. Just look at this way...anything is better than stock.  Nasty ass rusty POS.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I don't really like handjobs. I don't like things you give me that I could give myself. Except when I do it, it's a hundred times better. It's like making Emeril Lagasse a microwaved cheeseburger for dinner. Think about the face Emeril would make if you made him Hot Pockets; that's the face I make when I'm getting a handjob."
|
|
|
87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2004, 05:04:37 PM » |
|
9 bajillion trillion horsepower wow thatd be nice lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
speedfreak87
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident

Posts: 17535
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2004, 05:04:57 PM » |
|
If you are working on a newer five liter ('80 and up)it is a 50oz balance. The old 289/302's were 28 oz balance.
what dipshi... I mean what he said.. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2004, 05:06:19 PM » |
|
its for my 87
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
speedfreak87
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident

Posts: 17535
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2004, 05:07:38 PM » |
|
50 oz.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dan
Need An Enema?
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident

Posts: 20200
Vehicle: 2004 Ford Focus
Detroit
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2004, 05:07:54 PM » |
|
not your 92? haha. sorry joe, i love you! (in a completely heterosexual way)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I don't really like handjobs. I don't like things you give me that I could give myself. Except when I do it, it's a hundred times better. It's like making Emeril Lagasse a microwaved cheeseburger for dinner. Think about the face Emeril would make if you made him Hot Pockets; that's the face I make when I'm getting a handjob."
|
|
|
Dave88LX
It's all Nuts and Bolts
Badass Member
    
Posts: 9428
Vehicle: 1997 Pontiac Firebird
Crush the Chargers.
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2004, 05:15:42 PM » |
|
THIS IS A *** damn TECH QUESTION! PUT IT IN THE RIGHT FORUM!  
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2004, 05:17:26 PM » |
|
wow this thread suddenly has a different feel lol j/k
I found a pioneer balancer on summit for 115$ the summit brand harmonic is 270$and then theres TCI torsoinal vibration absorber for 375$ what is the huge difference between these
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
|
|
Freakingstang
is the one with The Magic Ballz
Badass Supporter
Badass Member

Posts: 4264
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2004, 06:05:55 PM » |
|
Wow, that is cheaper than a stock replacement....<off to search MMFF aticle>
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve, one of many... Badass 1986 GT VERT, 1989 Notch, 1966 Coupe 
|
|
|
87cobra
Proud Canadian Woot!!
Badass Member
    
Posts: 1626
Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2004, 06:17:25 PM » |
|
wow that sounds like a sweet deal have u heard of anything bad about em yet or is it all good so far that would be a big possibilty for me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Faster Is The Only Way To Go, None Of That Ricer s***!!
|
|
|
quake101
Webmaster
Administrator
Badass Member

Posts: 4897
Vehicle: 1990 Ford Mustang GT
Ohio
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2004, 06:24:52 PM » |
|
"Hooligan Harmony We keep our engine together with a Professional Products PowerForce damper in part four of our Hooligan Hot Rod project." It starts on page 147. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mr. Black
Official H&R Spokesperson!!!
Badass Supporter
Badass Resident

Posts: 22325
Vehicle: 2005 Pontiac GTO
South Hill Wa.
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2004, 06:45:56 PM » |
|
Powerbond or Romac. 50 oz Stay away from any thing that says fluid. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are Steve, resistance is futile!!!
05 Pontiac GTO, 6.0, M6, The loud model with H&R SUSPENSION OF COURSE!
2008 VW Passat 2.0T, 18" BBS wheels. 99PSD CC SB 4X4 6spd
95 CR250R woods bike, 06 Suzuki DR-Z400SM
|
|
|
|
Aussie XAXB
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2004, 08:23:06 AM » |
|
The 1968 engine I am building of course uses a 28 oz. balancer. I am replacing the original with a quality aftermarket stock replacement one (about $70). In my case I happen to be replacing the pistons, rods, and crank so everything is being balanced as perfectly as possible already by my speed shop. The block has also been align honed.
I don't know if a newer engine can be balanced in such a way as to use a 28 oz. balancer or not? I would think if the assembly can all be balanced (all pistons the same weight, rods machined to same weight, and crank balanced with flex plate and a 28 oz balancer) then it would be possible to get away with a 28 ouncer. Perhaps the construction of the components don't make this possible? Does anyone know about this? Certainly the less weight that you are slinging around the better it would be for the engine.
Steve #7
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Freakingstang
is the one with The Magic Ballz
Badass Supporter
Badass Member

Posts: 4264
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2004, 07:13:45 PM » |
|
I don't know if a newer engine can be balanced in such a way as to use a 28 oz. balancer or not? I would think if the assembly can all be balanced (all pistons the same weight, rods machined to same weight, and crank balanced with flex plate and a 28 oz balancer) then it would be possible to get away with a 28 ouncer. Perhaps the construction of the components don't make this possible? Does anyone know about this? Certainly the less weight that you are slinging around the better it would be for the engine.
Steve #7
Well the crank and rods are the same, the only difference would be in the Flywheel. You would have to change the flywheel and Balancer. I have yet to find a 28oz Flywheel with a 10.5" clutch pattern, other than an SFI approved big money unit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve, one of many... Badass 1986 GT VERT, 1989 Notch, 1966 Coupe 
|
|
|
|